Rules either semifinalist even if a comp identifies who came in third and who came in fourth. For example, at a 24-team comp, a winner will be awarded 23 points, a finalist 22 points, and semifinalists 20 points each. At Jessup, ABA NAAC and NYC Bar National MCC, top eight American teams will earn double the points of American teams "edged out" at that national/international runoff of national/international qualifiers. At Pace Enviro, top nine teams receive points. two calendar years will be placed in the Ranking Season in which it began oral arguments. best brief, advocate, professionalism, etc. team comp will not earn the winning program 199 points. This prevents a single team from making a program look good. A good program will develop numerous law students into strong advocates. (Imagine: if I had done otherwise, and the winner of moot court's 185- team NYC Bar National MCC had earned 184 points for its program, it would have taken other programs semifinalist finishes at ten 24-team comps to catch up.) TheRanker@LawSchoolAdvocacy.com. Send me links/official emails (links to brief banks so I can count the number of teams). Send me your competition contact's email address so I can email them. There is no longer any minimum number of teams for a comp to count. The "locked" 2007 and 2008 Ranking Seasons will not change. For moot court, the team must be paying/brief-writing (a no-show is excused if these two requirements are met). like the practice, comps open only to ABA schools are fine. Members-only comps are fine if membership is open to everyone. The 2009 Ranking Season will not be locked until early 2010 to account for the national run-off of the NYC Bar National MCC. Get me all results by that time. |
| BRIAN KOPPEN'S |
| LAW SCHOOL ADVOCACY |